You are here: Home › Investor Information: Tyranny of Costs
There are mainly three facilities one may use to invest in equities on the stock market, namely:
Each of these facilities has different advantages and disadvantages and which one to choose will very much depend on your own expertise and knowledge of the equity markets.
The most important issue, however, which is often neglected or ignored by investors is the cost aspects applicable to these different facilities.
Whilst almost all private investors (retail investors) have a solid grasp of the "magic of compound interest" as it relates to future yields, very few seem to really grasp the "tyranny of compounding costs" and its impact on eventual return when choosing a trading facility.
If one uses a worst choice scenario over a really long-term the impact of this tyranny of compounding costs can be devastating to the potential yield of such an investment.
For Example:
It is surprising to see how few average investors really understand the extent of the impact of factors, such as investment term and yield difference between a 10% annual compound yield and a 20% annual compound yield.
As unbelievable as it may seem, you still find investors who seem to think that a 20% annual return is only twice as good as a 10% annual return.
Make no mistake, if you are investing for the long-term even 1% can make a massive difference to your eventual
yield or profits.
[ More... ]
To illustrate the extent of impact different percentages may have on an investment, let us look at the situation where one invested a lump sum of R100,000 for 30 years and for the sake of simplicity we assume no costs were charged.
Therefore, a 20% return over the above period is actually 13.6 times better than a 10% return.
Certain cost elements should be considered when choosing an access facility to the equity markets, namely:
The latter fee has the least impact on the outcome of an investment mostly because it is not related to the size or value of the portfolio.
For example, the R1,200 annual Valana subscription fee on a portfolio of R500,000 represents a charge of as little as 0.24%.
The ideal scenario when choosing an equity investment facility will be one where you make your own trading decisions, either through a registered broker with no mandate to trade on your behalf, or through an on line trading facility.
Any method where you can avoid intermediation fees being charged that will erode the profits in your portfolio is strongly recommended.
To really grasp the impact of the three most important elements of an investment namely, compound growth obtained, term of investment and tyranny of costs, let us assume that R100,000 was invested at a gross average annual yield of 12% over three different terms and let us compare it using different platforms or facilities for such an investment.
Also, let us assume that except for the first two situations an average dividend of 4% was earned each year on the funds invested in the equity markets.
To illustrate the impact the table below shows the approximate outcomes obtained:
| Situation applicable | 50-year term | 40-year term | 20-year term | ||
| Investment free of costs and no dividends | R28,900,000 | R9,305,000 | R964,600 | ||
| Investment Fund with fairly high costs | R7,222,000 | R3,027,700 | R533,861 | ||
| One could argue that the overall yield should be higher as the dividends received by the Fund are included in the NAV growth of the Fund, but our experience found little evidence of it being so. | |||||
| Dividends not reinvested and zero costs | R39,652,300 | R12,741,700 | R1,287,400 | ||
| Dividends reinvested and no other costs | R205,384,700 | R44,673,900 | R2,113,600 | ||
| Added yield if dividends reinvested | 417% | 250% | 64% | ||
| Over the long-term, it would be very hard for any investor to beat a portfolio of quality dividend stocks where such dividends are reinvested during the term. | |||||
| If no intermediation fees applied | R31,675,600 | R10,533,200 | R1,144,200 | ||
| If a 2% annual intermediation fee applied | R12,121,167 | R4,923,500 | R790,200 | ||
| If a 3% annual intermediation fee applied | R7,492,200 | R3,365,800 | R656,560 | ||
| Profits sacrificed (re high and low above) | 76% | 68% | 42% | ||
| The question one has to ask oneself is whether the benefits, if any, obtained from giving a broker a full mandate is worth sacrificing such a large portion of one's profits. | |||||
| Expert trading direct on line with low costs | R34,937,000 | R11,420,000 | R1,198,400 | ||
| Giving broker a full mandate (small account) | R10,000,000 | R4,213,000 | R720,700 | ||
| Giving broker a full mandate (large account) | R12,449,700 | R5,030,400 | R799,150 | ||
| There can be little doubt, for you to enjoy most of your profits you need to be an expert with sufficient expertise and knowledge and you will need the time to do in-depth review and analysis. | |||||
| Using Valana source and on line trading | R32,048,400 | R10,490,800 | R1,114,000 | ||
From the above it should be clear that unless you are an expert on the markets and unless you have adequate time, skills and knowledge to analyse and select your own companies to invest in, the Valana model will probably be the most effective manner to enjoy better profits.
Brokers will, of course, be very quick to tell one that the annual intermediation fee they charge, where a full mandate applies, is for the good advice and stock selection recommendations they make and to some extent it is true, but you should decide whether you are prepared to sacrifice so much of your potential gain for this advice.
Research clearly showed that stock brokers are essentially more sales-orientated than they are good stock pickers. After all, their primary function is to get clients to trade as often as possible.
From the experience our team had during the past ten years with several broker houses, we came to the conclusion that although they mostly had good knowledge of the markets, they did not always demonstrate convincingly that they have the ability to select really good stocks.
They also tend to focus on the few popular liquid or large cap stocks and they seem to sell good stocks too soon.
The most important thing to realise is that they could never care about your money the same way you do.
[ Less... ]